A comparison of weekly particulate levels across sample cities and towns

By -
There are lots of ways to look at measurements for air pollution and different time frames that people and regulators look at. If we look at the weekly average for particulate at the PM 2.5 scale across several PurpleAir sensors, some interesting and troubling trends become evident.
Here are some 7 day averages from a sample of sensors in British Columbia and one wild card sensor - downtown Los Angeles near Dodger Stadium. LA is known around the world for the poor quality of its air.
Here's what we see. The worst weekly average in Canada can be found in Prince George BC with 16.06. Prince George has an active pulp and paper mill, other significant sources of industrial pollution, and lots of people who burn wood for residential heating.

In Parksville we see a weekly average of 10.85. This is mostly a retirement community on Vancouver Island and the readings from this sensor are likely due fully to wood smoke emissions from residential sources.


One of our sensors is Kamloops is 800m away from an active pulp and paper operation and its weekly average is 8.34. Based on a review of past data from this sensor there appears to be little residential wood burning in this area. Wood smoke has a very specific and identifiable signature.


Downtown Vancouver has a weekly average of 3.9. This is a city with 600,000 people, a fair amount of vehicular traffic, but wood burning is not commonly practiced at the residential level.


Our wildcard of LA had a weekly average of 12.88.


It should be clear that wood burning is a main driver of air pollution in many communities, and you may be surprised to see worse air pollution this time of year in small cities and towns in BC when compared to Vancouver and LA.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PurpleAir sensor readings are virtually indistinguishable from government monitors according to new peer reviewed study

By -
In August of 2016, the Gabriola Island Clear Air Society brought online the first PurpleAir sensor network in Canada. Our sensor network has documented extensively the staggering amount of air pollution coming from wood stoves and fireplaces on our tiny island. As the number of PurpleAir sensors expanded across the province and elsewhere in Canada, many began to raise questions about the accuracy of these low-cost devices. There have been several studies to-date that all show the same thing: these devices work, are accurate, reliable, and fill in gaps in air quality monitoring. The newest study from Australia by Dr. Dorothy Robinson provides definitive evidence that should quash any concerns about using PurpleAir sensors. See the study here .  Gabriola Island Clean Air Society director Dr. Michael Mehta has the following to say about this study. This paper provides empirical evidence to show that the use of low-cost PM2.5 monitors for measuring air quality on a distributed basis has me
Read more

How clean are the emissions from a SUV?

By -
Image
In August 2015 we decided to test the PM 2.5 levels from a 2013 Ford Explorer with a V8 engine. The nephelometer (Radiance Research M90 )  was positioned 15cm away from the exhaust pipe on a calm day. After several minutes of readings on a warmed up engine, the PM 2.5 levels ranged between 8 and 11 with a modal response of approximately 8.5. Here's a photo of the experiment. This shows us how clean vehicles emissions are when compared to woodsmoke fires.   Paradoxically you would be safer (at least from a PM 2.5 perspective) breathing off this tailpipe like a snorkel than  living near a wood fire like this where readings have sometimes hit 200 (ten times the provincial limit).
Read more